The University of Calgary Gauntlet®
  2008-10-02
(NOTE: Archived content:
Current issue here)

[image]
Previous Issues

News
New chair tackles domestic violence
Speaker denounces nuclear dangers
No one left to point students in the right direction
From Wall Street to Main Street
Bees with disease bring farmers to their knees
CJSW takes another baby step towards new crib
Speaker gives university education to those in need
Student finds smallest dino in North America
News for the unnewsed
Housing debate continues, slowly

Opinions
HPV freakout
Letter: affordable housing blues
Letter: a call to abandon ship
Mind fights: The abolition of arts funding
Promoting promiscuity?
Nuclear energy's powerful questions
The Beatles are overrated
W's terrible legacy
A country's degradation
People who shouldn't nap:
The benefit of teach-o-nauts
With Glowing Hearts we trademark thee
The trouble of being Kanye
The incorrect response to HPV: jeopardizing the health of young girls
SU View

Sports
CIS CANADA WEST MEN'S HOCKEY PREVIEW 2008-09
Women soccersaurs get their roar back
Dino volleysaurs tourney champs
Nill lands new recruit
Dinos golf teams repeat as ACAC champions in Red Deer
Our football is better than your football
Dinos deliver in biggest game to date
UBC netminder fools Dinos once, Dinos get last laugh
First win feels good for field hockeyers

Entertainment
Blindness provides insight into humanity
Religion + ridiculous = preachy doc
Blind Melon is more than just the bee girl
The Horrorpops do the ol' switcheroo
Nick and Norah mixes a love story with sketched indie title font
The numbers balance out for 3
Funk singer Slim Twig has the skinny on success
October music is pretty good
Movie adaptation takes Palahniuk's words too literally
Spun: Gym Class Heroes
Spun: Underoath
Spun: Jarvis Church
Spun: The Famines




  People who shouldn't nap:
Pilots, probably




[Print] Print this story
 (Click for larger image.)

Credit: Raymond Ang / the Gauntlet  


ADVERTISMENT

ADVERTISMENT

For people who are afraid of flying, having to board an aircraft for a flight can be a startling ordeal. When faced with the actual logistics of flight, the potential for disaster increases in our minds. But as the famous saying suggests, "You are more likely to die in a car accident than in a plane crash." There are, of course, individuals who don't even think twice about boarding an aircraft. These are the regular fliers and travellers who are comfortable with the experience. Unfortunately, sometimes regular fliers, like pilots, take this comfort to dangerous new heights.

Earlier this week in Hawaii two airline pilots who fell asleep in the cockpit returned to work after a 60-day suspension. Captain Scott Oltman and First Officer Dillon Shepley were commanding a flight from Honolulu to Hilo when they both "unintentionally" fell asleep inside the cockpit. The flight takes approximately 45 minutes. The pilots did not respond to the air traffic controller until about 20 minutes after they should've landed. They had to take the aircraft into a loop and approach the runway again for a second attempt at landing the 40 passengers onboard. It is true that modern jets have many computers and tools to aid pilots in flying, but falling asleep at the wheel, so to speak, is not acceptable. Pilots are responsible for many lives in addition to their own and must be extra vigilant in carrying out their task.

Go! Airlines, Oltman and Shepley's employer, has made it a matter of policy to always allow pilots sufficient rest time in between flights. This leaves little excuse for the blunder. Oltman was later diagnosed with severe obstructive sleep apnea, which causes people to stop breathing in their sleep and interrupts regular sleep patterns. While we might sympathize with Oltman, his predicament can't help but raise a question: should a person in that condition be flying an aircraft?

Perhaps it is too harsh to suggest that as punishment these men should never fly an aircraft again. We all make mistakes after all. But to return to work at full pay after a brief suspension seems far too lenient. The penalty in this case should at least serve to strongly discourage pilots of acting irresponsibly, which could include a pay reduction after a lengthy suspension or even dismissal by the employer. Pilots have tremendous responsibility for the safety of an aircraft. Even though the statistics show the relative safety of air travel, it could be completely nullified by irresponsible pilots.

Share this story: del.icio.us digg Fark NewsVine Reddit YahooMyWeb


Reader Comments:

 Add your comment or send a letter to the editor

No comments found. Be the first!

 Views expressed are those of the posters and do not necessarily reflect that of the Gauntlet.

ADVERTISMENT

ADVERTISMENT

RSS icon RSS Feeds:
[ Main - News - Opinions - Entertainment - Sports ]
Volunteer at the Gauntlet®
.