The University of Calgary Gauntlet®
  2008-10-09
(NOTE: Archived content:
Current issue here)

[image]
Previous Issues

News
Pack up the paints
More money needed for post-secondary students
Military spending versus reconstruction
Canada's Northern frontier in a war of words
Health care in need of improvement
Green research and development a common goal
Alberta's precious resource gets a second look
Helping those in need
Self-regulation insufficient
Polling on campus a bittersweet victory
Student apathy on the rise
10 Year Plan to end homelessness underway
The Alberta-China trade
EnCana's pipes crossed a line
Calgary's ridings in brief

Opinions
The rise of bleeding heart conservatism
Letter: In defence of housing policy
Letter: Urban dreaming
Mind Fights: How should we govern ourselves
Letter: Conservative disappointment
Voting blind
You have no excuse
No complaints here
The failure of Canada's New Left
Of cash and owls
The return of freak power
SU View
Disturbing deficit
Sex swings
Quit hatin' dem Rhinos
Topplin' trees
Politics and Quebec

Sports
Soccersaurs down and out in doubleheader
Goyette guides women's hockey squad into new ACAC season
Roberto Luongo: O captain, my captain!
Women's soccer team in last playoff spot with four games left
Dinos pressure not enough to thwart strong T-Birds
Sport shorts: football returns, athletes of the week

Entertainment
Festival highlights the importance of words
From audience to author
Artist breaks down preconceptions
Rockers Shai Hulud weather the career storm
Porpoises canít talk
Calgary singer takes overseas success back home
A veritable visual feast fit for a king
Beverly Hills Chihuahua chokes
Spun: Metallica
Spun: Night Flowers
Spun: Tori Amos
Comeback Kid takes an unconventional yet hardcore approach



AP
The 40th Federal Election Drinking Game

  Disturbing deficit





[Print] Print this story

ADVERTISMENT

ADVERTISMENT

After watching the leaders debate, It is difficult to accept that all the federal parties find the prospect of financial deficit completely unacceptable, but not one of them can even bring up the concept of an environmental deficit. This is a serious issue and one that our leaders are too short sighted to even mention. This issue will likely cost us more than any financial deficit. Having grown up in the '90s, I have a certain appreciation of how difficult it was, not only for the government, but also for average tax paying families, to turn the tide on the fiscal deficit. In those days, it had to be done. Canada had its credit rating downgraded, which was a big eye opener. The big spending had to come to an end.

This is the situation that we, as young Canadians, have inherited. While I know it is unpopular to come down on the previous generations because, quite obviously, they have done a great deal to improve the quality of life in our country. The fact remains, however, that they did this by living well beyond their means. Their debt will loom over us for at least our generation's entire working careers and maybe a few more generations, depending how aggressive we are at paying it down. While our debt is an enormous burden, we are currently leaving an even larger one for generations to follow-- an environmental one.

Everyone has heard of sustainable living­-- the art of living within one's means, both financially and ecologically. You have likely heard that if everyone lived like us spoiled North Americans we would need about four planets to satisfy our gluttonous ways. Our problem is over consumption and the major cause is cheap goods.

Those cheap, easily replaceable goods are partially funded by the taxpayer since they assume the burden of waste disposal. If companies had to pay for the disposal of their goods, there would be a lot less wasteful packaging. This year, for example, the City of Calgary is spending seven per cent of its tax-supported operating budget and 20 per cent of its capital budget on waste management. Alberta has no shortage of landfill space, but the city of Toronto does. From there, hundreds of truckloads of waste a day are shipped to the United States each day, a band-aid solution that is coming to an end in 2010. Because of this, the city is considering either the banning of paper coffee cups, or charging a $0.30 levy per cup, among other things. Personally, I think this an encouraging beginning towards charging the consumer for the life cycle of their purchases. Until we begin doing this, we will never be able to grasp the real cost of our lifestyle and we will not change our wasteful ways.

Share this story: del.icio.us digg Fark NewsVine Reddit YahooMyWeb


Reader Comments:

 Add your comment or send a letter to the editor

No comments found. Be the first!

 Views expressed are those of the posters and do not necessarily reflect that of the Gauntlet.

ADVERTISMENT

ADVERTISMENT

RSS icon RSS Feeds:
[ Main - News - Opinions - Entertainment - Sports ]
Volunteer at the Gauntlet®
.