The University of Calgary Gauntlet®
  2009-11-19
(NOTE: Archived content:
Current issue here)

[image]
Previous Issues

News
Province breaks promise on tuition cap
Getting to know the interim president
Schulich study aims to revitalize construction in North America
Community remembers Reverend Ron
Future of quality money initiative in question with rising deficit
A breakfast with public policy power players
Prof studies changing face of human interaction
Changes coming in Mac Hall
B.C. to introduce 'Education Quality Assurance' program

Opinions
Editorial: Calgary Transit funding in peril
Going for the green: Olympic torches for sale
Sweet November: the wonderful month of beards
A love letter to Charles Darwin
China's condom catastrophe

Sports
Dinos win second straight Hardy Cup
Dinos sports briefs: on the road again
Glavic situation water under the bridge for SMU

Entertainment
A local way to see large scale injustices
King Khan rocks out at school BBQs
Spun: Matt Epp
Spun: Air
Spun: Dead Man's Bones
Spun: Muse

Features
The Lost Art of Letter Writing


AP
An open letter to you, from me your tuition

  Province breaks promise on tuition cap





[Print] Print this story
Despite an assurance in the Post-Secondary Learning Act that tuition would only be raised by 1.5 per cent, some may pay more. (Click for larger image.) Despite an assurance in the Post-Secondary Learning Act that tuition would only be raised by 1.5 per cent, some may pay more.

Credit: Chris Pederson / The Gauntlet  


ADVERTISMENT

ADVERTISMENT

Tuition
NEWSTuition hike to protect cap: minister
NEWSThe value of an education: recession edition
NEWSTuition keeps on climbing
NEWSTuition goes up... again
NEWSNew tuition policy nothing new

Despite an assurance in the Post-Secondary Learning Act that tuition would only be raised by 1.5 per cent, the provincial government has created a loophole for post-secondary institutions to raise tuition in some cases.

The loophole means universities can submit an application to modify tuition costs for various degrees according to market demand. According to this plan, degrees with a higher market demand, such as engineering, medicine or law, would cost more than an arts or sciences degree.

Advanced Education Minister Doug Horner said the option would not be available to all institutions.

"Whatever proposal [institutions] bring forward to the [Advanced Education] department has to be fair, has to be equitable. It has to have a proper case behind it," Horner said. "They have to show a very solid reason as to why we would look at adjusting the base of a particular program or particular tuition."

"There have been no decisions made on differential tuition," said University of Calgary spokesperson Grady Semmens. "The usual procedure is that the U of C administration talks to the Students' Union [first]."

"The fact that the province is saying differential tuition may be an option for certain programs doesn't mean [it will be implemented at the U of C]," he added.

Students' Union president Charlotte Kingston thinks the tuition model should remain untouched.

"The current model took years upon years to agree upon. The government made a commitment to keeping this until at least 2016. By not sticking to it they are breaking their promise."

Anything resembling a differential tuition model should be avoided because of the negative effects it would have on prospective students, Kingston insisted. For example, a student with a passion for a higher demand degree, like law, might not pursue that career in favour of a less expensive education.

"[It] prescribes educational and career choices that students can make based on their ability to pay."

Though rising tuition costs are the first concern, Kingston is also apprehensive about rising compulsory fees for services provided by the university in addition to tuition. According to a recent Statistics Canada publication, Alberta post secondaries have the highest compulsory fees in the country.

The framework used right now is called cost recovery, Kingston explained, which means the U of C can only charge students for delivery of services.

She argued the current framework doesn't do enough to prevent rising fees and allows the university to slip in extra costs by creating new "services" to charge for -- like the Campus Common Spaces, Sustainability and Safety Fee proposed at the University of Alberta.

Advanced Education and Technology spokesperson Donna McColl said the ministry believes the Statistics Canada report is faulty.

"We have noted that compulsory fee calculation in [the] Statistics Canada report was done wrong," said McColl. "The compulsory fees at the U of C did increase by three per cent over 2008 to 2009, but Statistics Canada included a newly introduced health and dental plan at U of A. It is a non-compulsory fee, so it skewed the results. They added an extra $192 a year from the U of A that shouldn't have been included."

She added that the ministry would contact Statistics Canada to ensure this didn't happen again.

The SU sent Advanced Education and Technology Minister Doug Horner a letter, and urges students to do the same. The minister responded by setting up a meeting with the SU on Dec. 9.

The SU will be holding an event leading up to the meeting regarding tuition Tuesday and Wednesday in the south courtyard. On Wednesday there will be a discussion panel from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

Share this story: del.icio.us digg Fark NewsVine Reddit YahooMyWeb


Reader Comments:

 Add your comment or send a letter to the editor

Posted: 2009-11-21 15:46:00
#1 - Gauntlet falls for SU propaganda with sensationalist headline--

Editors understate the role of university administration and rising real world costs in setting fees



–A Student


Posted: 2009-11-27 15:10:40
#2 - At least the headline is sourced, if not attributed.

Maybe they're moving to the Wikipedia model, where facts about others' "facts" are more important than the actual facts themselves.


–Anonymous Coward


Posted: 2010-01-04 12:19:24
#3 - On November 19, as an Alberta government spokesperson I stated that student fees for health and dental services at the University of Alberta were not compulsory and ought not to have been included in Statistics Canada calculations. In the interest of preserving the trust of Gauntlet readers a clarification is in order. There was no “mistake” by Statistics Canada. Rather, it was a matter of uniform reporting of the various ways institutions and/or students unions implement health and/or dental plans. The reporting of the University of Alberta fees by Statistics Canada was consistent with the way in which these types of fees are reported by other institutions reporting to this survey.
Nevertheless, in order to ensure that the way in which student fees are reported continues to be appropriate, comparable and relevant, Statistics Canada has indicated that it will be reviewing the way in which these data are collected and classified in advance of the next cycle of this survey.


–Donna J. McColl, Assistant Communications Directo


 Views expressed are those of the posters and do not necessarily reflect that of the Gauntlet.

ADVERTISMENT

ADVERTISMENT

RSS icon RSS Feeds:
[ Main - News - Opinions - Entertainment - Sports ]
Volunteer at the Gauntlet®
.